|
Chapter 43 WHAT IF YOU WERE IN CHARGE? ![]() NOTES: 1. There are at least two primary reasons why the Democrats have not achieved any type of meaningful health care reform including both a strong public option and several other key components necessary to legitimately reform our nation's current catastrophic health industry disaster: 1) President Obama failed to come out swinging strongly for a single-payer option, which probably would not have been achieved but nevertheless, doing so would have focused the media debate way left of where it landed and thus, forced moderate Democrats and Republicans to go along with a strong public option, which could and should have been introduced far later in the game. It would likely then have been perceived by a large middle-of-the-road cross-section of American citizens and the media as being a fair, legitimate compromise. Instead, Obama "compromised" right out the gate, eliminating a single-payer plan in favor of a public option and thus, he gave away the farm before planting any seeds of rationality and reason in the public perception eye. 2) Obama failed to personally publicly offer a legitimate detailed plan, allowing the media and opposition party to fill in the blanks as they so chose and thus, they seized on a golden opportunity to support the best interests of their health industry advertising and campaign bribery dollars, accordingly. 2. FDR essentially inaugurated a "national period of mourning" upon taking office during the Depression, scaling back much of the fluff and finery normally associated with the office and refusing to take vacations even when his health very much demanded it. This is the very least that both Bush Junior and President Obama, who do not have polio and thus do not desperately need warm spring baths, could and should have done in order to demonstrate to the American public that their expressed sympathies towards the jobless and homeless are sincere and, not merely empty words of political rhetoric. 3. There is a reason why it is called the "presidential bully pulpit". Franklin and especially Theodore Roosevelt knew how to correctly use it towards getting their agenda rammed through a highly reluctant opposing majority in Congress, whereas after his first year in office, even though his party holds a commanding majority in both chambers, President Obama obviously doesn't have a clue how to "bully" Congress into richly well-deserved and proper public humiliation and shame, followed by meek submission with corporate wagging tail tucked between lobbiest-propelled legs, to save their own hyporcitical political asses. It is probably fair to say that if Obama was president when Theodore Roosevelt was in office: a) our national parks today would look very much like certain areas of Appalachia do since Junior's administration "clear-gutted" them into oblivion; b) corporations would hold even far worse monopoly sway than they do now, still deliberately marketing bad meat and bogus medicines; c) workers safety regulations, working hours, benefits and unionizing capabilities would resemble the Dark Ages mass peasantry and serfdom goal of the neo-cons; and d) the U.S. Navy would look like the few bathtub toys it did prior to Roosevelt demanding that Congress spend the modern equivalent of hundreds of billions of dollars to re-build it from being among the worst to the strongest naval presence on the globe. Being a strong pacifist, I do not applaud Roosevelt regarding this Naval buildup, but I do understand the "presidential bully pulpit" means being forcefully and correctly applied toward achieving political agenda ends, when I see it. 4. One of the long-standing worst things wrong with how the United States government, is run is the long-standing incredibly ignorant practice of appointing corporation pawns, friends, relatives, political cronies and otherwise, some of the most incompetant, crooked and morally bankrupt members of our society, to head important departments of state and act as presidential advisors; rather than appointing qualified people who are expert in their particular field and, remain unfettered by corporate ties. All one needs to do is take a quick historical look at the presidency of Ulysses S. Grant or thumb through a few pages of "The Gilded Age" by Mark Twain to understand why. 5. National political leaders should always be willing to take the JFK "high-road" approach of donating their salary to charity or else, working for minimum wage. The median wage is suggested here only because of the hard-headedness of those pretending to be "representatives" with our best interests at heart. It is understandable that a freshman or a few other congressional leaders may need an income substantial enough to feed their families, but the majority of Congressional leaders are millionaires many times over and as such, those accepting wages and especially health care benefits from the public trough when not truly needing them, while millions of American citizens lack jobs, health care and the ability to pay for basic food and shelter, belong in federal prison rather than being allowed to continue to pose as representatives of we the people. 6. And finally, as of this writing President Obama having recently debated Republicans face-to-face on camera, seems to be learning from his mistakes and as such, he may yet be able to pull a few magic rabbits out of his battered political hat. We can only hope that he continues to lean more towards the Roosevelts, rather than appearing like Bush Junior made over in finer costume and more adeptness of fancy phrase.
|